My Photo

Disclaimer

  • This is my personal weblog. The opinions expressed are my own and not those of my employer. My work related blog is at Microsoft StartupZone.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Mobile and Local search heating up | Main | 2007 Predictions for the web and software »

Google search market share versus search referral share

Rich Skrenta, founder of  Topix.net, wrote a blog today "Google's true search market share is 70%". A prominent Yahoo blogger, Jeremy Zawodny, confirms that he gets 92% of his inbound traffic from Google, and less than 3% from Yahoo. Traffic to my blog from Google runs consistently around 75%. Yesterday traffic to my blog broke out as follows;  69.5% from Google, 1% Yahoo, 1% MSN, 10% links from other bloggers, and 18% links from my own blog to other posts.

Search referrals are different than number of searches performed. Rich, Jeremy, and I are measuring search referrals to our sites, versus market share for the number of total searches performed.  You have to ask yourself, how important are searches that didn't lead to a referral? Meaning, the searcher didn't actually click on a result.

ComScore says search market share for October 2006 was: Google 45%, Yahoo 28%, MSN Live 12%, Ask 6%, AOL 5%, and Other 4%.

Hitwise says search market share for November 2006 was: Google 62%, Yahoo 22%, MSN/Live 10%, Ask 4%, and Other 2%.

Danny Sullivan, the search guru who now runs SearchEngineLand says "On average (comScore, NetRatings & Hitwise for October 2006), Google has a 52 percent share. But he's still dead on target that if you talk to site owners, Google drives a far higher percentage than the share of searches happening. It's more like 70 to 90- something for them."

Rich Skrenta says "Sitting here in Palo Alto, running a web business, it's pretty clear who the winner of the search game is. But every month I have to suffer through reading about Google's supposed 40-something percent market share. Everybody involved in the search industry and everyone who actually runs a website knows these numbers are completely wrong." 

Skrenta looked at 10 popular web sites and measured inbound search traffic links using Hitwise data. He included his own site, Topix.net, so that he could calibrate the Hitwise data to his own server logs and Google Analytics reports. His analysis proves Hitwise is pretty accurate. Here is a table of results from Rich's blog;


Site hitwise-google hitwise-yahoo hitwise-msn hitwise-ask                  Google                 Yahoo                  MSN                   Ask hitwise-total
apple.com 8.62 2.38 1.69 0 67.9% 18.8% 13.3% 0.0% 12.69
craigslist 7.48 3.4 1.17 0.12 61.5% 27.9% 9.6% 1.0% 12.17
ebay 10.12 3.36 2.57 0.44 61.4% 20.4% 15.6% 2.7% 16.49
flickr 17.72 7.26 1.34 0.45 66.2% 27.1% 5.0% 1.7% 26.77
nytimes 16.67 2.84 1.34 0.53 78.0% 13.3% 6.3% 2.5% 21.38
topix.net 40.5 10.02 0.65 1.56 76.8% 19.0% 1.2% 3.0% 52.73
tripadvisor 47.57 5.87 3.51 1.42 81.5% 10.1% 6.0% 2.4% 58.37
usatoday 6.43 2.07 1.4 0 64.9% 20.9% 14.1% 0.0% 9.9
wikipedia 48.36 10.98 3.66 2.57 73.8% 16.7% 5.6% 3.9% 65.57
youtube 12.97 2.28 2.16 0 74.5% 13.1% 12.4% 0.0% 17.41
Average 70.6% 18.7% 8.9% 1.7%


Who do you believe? You know all the jokes about statistics. My guess is all the numbers are correct...it is just the definitions and parameters are different. Search referral is different than number of searches. It seems logical to me that people searching for technical topics covered in blogs have a different profile, and perhaps use different search engines, than people searching for popular themes.

What is your experience? What do the traffic logs from your blog or web site say? What are your normal search habits?

Subscribe - To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email go here and enter your email address in the box in the right column.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf9da53ef00d834796aed69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google search market share versus search referral share:

» More bad news for Windows Live Search traffic from Microsoft News Tracker
On a related note, Topix.net’s Rich Skrenta sparked a lot of discussion with his observation that based on referrals to prominent websites, Google’s ability to drive traffic is considerably greater than even its first place search share ranking wo... [Read More]

» Truth about Search Stats: Google Possibly 80% of the Search Market! from Michi Knows
TodayI noticed virtually none of my search traffic came from Yahoo, the supposed #2 player in search with a reported 23.6% (and falling) share of the search market. Below, I have compiled a list of the top referring search engines for 10 web site... [Read More]

Comments

comScore says they measure searches performed, but WebSideStory actually claims to measure searches referred. If that's the case, their numbers should match Hitwise's -- as well as everyone's server logs on the net. See http://www.websidestory.com/company/news-events/press-releases/2004-03-30.html

Rich, that link to WebSideStory is from March 2004...almost 3 years ago. Google has gained significant market share since then.

Here is a link to a more recent WebSideStory press release that says Google accounts for 75% of referrals in the UK, more in line with what we are seeing. http://www.websidestory.com/company/news-events/press-releases/2006-03-24.html

I checked their site and couldn't find any more recent press release.

I do agree however that there are big differences in market share estimates from HitWise, ComScore and WebSideStory.

Don

Perhaps Google has a greater number of referrals because more people return to their search results and click on additional found links. This might be good (people want more information from other sources) or bad (the first selected result was not what was desired). There's no way of knowing with the numbers we have.

Some people, esp. scientists and marketers watching competition also use META search engines and there, for reasons best known to the META guys, some of the larger engines don't figure PLUS it is sometimes easier to go directly to the link for a smaller engine, thus driving search traffic into smaller niches and distorting figures.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe